Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Banner Image

GEQ1917: Understanding and Critiquing Sustainability: A.R.T. Sources

A Resource Guide for Finding Information

What and Why use A.R.T. sources?

WHAT are A.R.T. Sources?

Information sources which are:

  • Authoritative
  • Relevant
  • Timely

 

WHY use A.R.T. Sources?

A.R.T. helps evaluate the trustworthiness of the sources for your research.

 

A.R.T. Sources guide in PDF

CRAAP Criteria

To investigate further, try the CRAAP Test.

Source:https://guides.library.utoronto.ca/c.php?g=698530&p=4961329

 

Re-Using this Guide?

Unless otherwise stated, the contents in this GEQ1917 guide © by National University of Singapore Libraries is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0 . Attribute and link back to this LibGuide if you are going to re-use the content.

Click to watch the video on A.R.T. Sources (1:46min)

Watch another video on A.R.T. Sources (2:35min)

F.A.Qs about A.R.T.

Q1. Is Wikipedia authoritative? It has citations and a list of references.

Check this description of Plato before the record was corrected:

 

Answer:

Wikipedia is editable. Anybody can add stuff and change stuff any time. Although Wikipedia is a quick way to get a sense of something, it is not authoritative for academic research.

Read what Wikipedia has to say about hoaxes.

 

Q2. Are websites with .com authoritative?

Websites with .com are usually commercial or business sites. Information given may be informational but the purpose is to get readers to be interested in buying from them. Therefore, you may not have the complete set of information or there may be some bias.